Skip to main content

Frankenstein, read with AI

Mary Shelley · 1818

Mary Shelley's *Frankenstein; or, The Modern Prometheus* is a nested narrative about the dangers of unchecked ambition and the moral obligations creators owe their creations. Framed by Robert Walton's Arctic letters to his sister, the novel presents Victor Frankenstein's account of a Genevese student who, at Ingolstadt, discovers the principle of life and animates a giant being, only to recoil in horror at what he has made. The creature, abandoned and universally rejected for its deformity, turns from benevolence to vengeance—murdering William, framing Justine, and ultimately destroying everyone Victor loves—while Victor's refusal to take responsibility, and his silence in the face of injustice, compound the catastrophe.

Open the bookFree, in your browser. Hover any citation to see the passage; click it to jump there.

Questions answered from the whole book

Each answer was written by MindMax after reading the full text, and every quotation was checked word for word against it.

Where does the creature's own account disagree with Victor's narration on the facts?

I'll dig into the two narratives where they overlap — the creature's story in Volume II and the passages where it collides with Victor's own account.Now let me check the two accounts of the same episodes — the wedding-night threat, the William/Justine business, and the broken promise about the female.Short version: on the bare facts of *who killed whom* the two accounts do not contradict each other — Victor knows, and the creature in the end confesses to the same list of victims. The disagreements are about what the creature was, why the deaths happened, and what would have followed. Here is where they actually collide.

1. What the creature was before he was made miserable. The creature's own story opens with a claim about his original nature: "I was benevolent and good; misery made me a fiend. Make me happy, and I shall again be virtuous" but I am rather the fallen angel, whom thou drivest from joy for no misdeed. Every where I see bliss, from which I alone am irrevocably excluded. I was benevolent and good;, and earlier in the same speech "I was benevolent; my soul glowed with love and humanity" Will no entreaties cause thee to turn a favourable eye upon thy creature, who implores thy goodness and compassion?. Victor's narration never entertains this: from the first sight of him he is "the dæmon", and Victor's reply to that very speech is "Abhorred monster! fiend that thou art! the tortures of hell are too mild a vengeance for thy crimes" come on then, that I may extinguish the spark which I so negligently bestowed.”. One says evil was *inflicted*; the other narrates it as *innate*. That is a factual dispute about the creature's initial disposition, and neither narrator concedes it.

2. Whether he took any pleasure in the killings. Victor tells Walton the creature is a "dæmon, whose delight is in death and wretchedness" “The hour of my weakness is past, and the period of your power is arrived. Your threats cannot move me to do an act of wickedness;, "full of treachery and fiend-like malice" and not to be heard that you will seek him, and satisfy my vengeance in his death. Yet, do I dare ask you to undertake my pilgrimage, to endure the hardships that I have undergone?. The creature's final account denies exactly that: "do you think that I was then dead to agony and remorse? … A frightful selfishness hurried me on, while my heart was poisoned with remorse … My heart was fashioned to be susceptible of love and sympathy" and, when wrenched by misery to vice and hatred, it did not endure the violence of the change without torture such as you cannot even imagine. Victor asserts a creature incapable of remorse; the creature asserts he was in torment throughout. These cannot both be true.

3. How William's death is framed. In the creature's telling it began as an attempt to take the boy as a companion — "Child, what is the meaning of this? I do not intend to hurt you" — and turned into a killing only when the boy screamed abuse and named his father: "Frankenstein! you belong then to my enemy … you shall be my first victim" (q37, q39; q31 "I grasped his throat to silence him"). But in the creature's closing confession he retracts the provocation: "I have strangled the innocent as they slept, and grasped to death his throat who never injured me or any other living thing" I think on the heart in which the imagination of it was conceived, and long for the moment when they will meet my eyes, when it will haunt my thoughts, no more. That is the creature disagreeing with himself — a provoked struggle in the narrative, an unprovoked murder of an innocent in the confession.

4. Justine: accident of evidence, or designed trap. Victor's Volume I narration treats her condemnation as circumstantial evidence and a coerced confession working themselves out ("all judges had rather that ten innocent should suffer, than that one guilty should escape. But she has confessed" all judges had rather that ten innocent should suffer, than that one guilty should escape. But she has confessed.”). The creature's account says he engineered it: seeing the portrait, "thanks to the lessons of Felix, and the sanguinary laws of man, I have learned how to work mischief," and "I placed the portrait securely in one of the folds of her dress" “While I was overcome by these feelings, I left the spot where I had committed the murder, and was seeking a more secluded hiding-place, when I perceived a woman passing near me. S. Where Victor's narrative is passive tragedy, the creature claims deliberate judicial murder.

5. The female companion — the most concrete factual clash. The creature swears the pair would be harmless: "I will go to the vast wilds of South America. My food is not that of man … acorns and berries afford me sufficient nourishment" “If you consent, neither you nor any other human being shall ever see us again: I will go to the vast wilds of South America. My food is not that of man;, and "My evil passions will have fled, for I shall meet with sympathy" but a moment ago you were moved by my representations, and why do you again harden yourself to my complaints?. Victor asserts the opposite outcome: "she might become ten thousand times more malignant than her mate" (q7) and "a race of devils would be propagated upon the earth" I had been struck senseless by his fiendish threats: but now, for the first time, the wickedness of my promise burst upon me;. Both state predictions as facts; the novel never adjudicates. What is not in dispute: Victor admits breaking the promise — "Begone! I do break my promise" never will I create another like yourself, equal in deformity and wickedness.” — and admits he tore the female apart before the creature's eyes (q9).

6. Who the author of the catastrophe is. Victor, dying, tells Walton the creature is the sole cause and must be destroyed. The creature's last speech names Victor instead: "That is also my victim! … I, who irretrievably destroyed thee by destroying all thou lovedst" I, who irretrievably destroyed thee by destroying all thou lovedst. Alas! — while conceding every fact of the murders. So the disagreement is purely about causal and moral responsibility, not events.

One gap I should flag: I could not read back a passage in which the creature himself states what he meant by "I shall be with you on your wedding-night" “It is well. I go; but remember, I shall be with you on your wedding-night.”. Victor's reading of that threat is on record; the creature's counter-explanation is not among the passages I checked, so I can't claim the two accounts differ there on evidence — only that Victor's reading is not corroborated by anything the creature says.

> ⏱ 这一轮查得太久,我用已有材料先给出回答。需要继续深挖的话,告诉我往哪个方向追。

What did Walton do to prepare his body and mind for the voyage?

Walton's preparation spans roughly six years and covers both body and mind, as he reports in his first letter to Margaret:

Body. He deliberately hardened himself: "I commenced by inuring my body to hardship. I accompanied the whale-fishers on several expeditions to the North Sea; I voluntarily endured cold, famine, thirst, and want of sleep; I often worked harder than the common sailors during the day" I commenced by inuring my body to hardship. I accompanied the whale-fishers on several expeditions to the North Sea; I voluntarily endured cold, famine, thirst, and want of sleep. He even signed on twice as an under-mate in a Greenland whaler, doing well enough that the captain begged him to stay as second-in-command. Later, travelling overland through Russia, he adopts furs as practical acclimatization for the northern cold.

Mind. While labouring by day, he "devoted my nights to the study of mathematics, the theory of medicine, and those branches of physical science from which a naval adventurer might derive the greatest practical advantage" devoted my nights to the study of mathematics, the theory of medicine, and those branches of physical science from which a naval adventurer might derive the greatest practical advantage. Before that, as a boy he had absorbed his uncle Thomas's whole library of voyage histories "day and night," and he credits a fixed goal itself as mental discipline: "nothing contributes so much to tranquillize the mind as a steady purpose,—a point on which the soul may fix its intellectual eye" nothing contributes so much to tranquillize the mind as a steady purpose,—a point on which the soul may fix its intellectual eye.

What he cannot prepare is companionship — in Letter II he laments having "no friend" aboard to share success or sustain him in dejection, and notes he is self-educated and illiterate beside a schoolboy of fifteen. His practical answer is to hire dependable, dauntless men, wait prudently for the spring thaw, and steel his spirits for departure — a "trembling sensation, half pleasurable and half fearful" the trembling sensation, half pleasurable and half fearful, with which I am preparing to depart.

Why did Victor's mother die of scarlet fever

She died because she caught the infection from Elizabeth. When Elizabeth contracted scarlet fever, the family urged Caroline to stay away, but as soon as she heard Elizabeth was recovering she "could no longer debar herself from her society, and entered her chamber long before the danger of infection was past." Victor calls the consequences of "this imprudence" fatal: on the third day Caroline sickened, "her fever was very malignant," and she died shortly after, joining Elizabeth's hand to Victor's on her deathbed and asking Elizabeth to take her place in the familyElizabeth had caught the scarlet fever; but her illness was not severe, and she quickly recovered. During her confinement, many arguments had been urged to persuade my mother to refrain from attending upon her.

So the direct cause is selfless maternal devotion — she couldn't bear to keep away from her ailing adopted daughter and exposed herself before it was safe. Notably, this is also the first of the novel's pattern of deaths traceable to a fateful decision: Elizabeth survives unharmed because her case was mild, while the one who came to nurse her dies — an early instance of care and love exacting the price that creation and ambition later do.

What evidence links Justine Moritz to William's murder, and why does Victor refuse to reveal the real murderer

The evidence against Justine

At her trial the prosecution builds its case entirely on circumstantial evidence — what the narrator calls "several strange facts combined against her" Several strange facts combined against her, which might have staggered any one who had not such proof of her innocence as I had:

  1. Her movements that night. She was out the whole night of the murder, and toward morning a market-woman saw her not far from where William's body was later found; questioned, "she looked very strangely, and only returned a confused and unintelligible answer" she looked very strangely, and only returned a confused and unintelligible answer. She returned home around eight, saying she had been searching for the lost child, and when shown the body she fell into violent hysterics and kept her bed for days — her confusion and distress were read as signs of guilt.
  1. The miniature portrait — the decisive proof. A servant found in Justine's pocket the picture Elizabeth had hung around William's neck an hour before he disappeared: "The picture was then produced, which the servant had found in her pocket" The picture was then produced, which the servant had found in her pocket; and when Elizabeth, in a faltering voice, proved that it was the same which, an hour before the child had been missed, she had placed round his neck. Justine can give no explanation for it — she admits "how heavily and fatally this one circumstance weighs against me, but I have no power of explaining it" “I know,” continued the unhappy victim, “how heavily and fatally this one circumstance weighs against me, but I have no power of explaining it, and Elizabeth herself calls the portrait "the bauble on which the chief proof rests."
  1. Her (false) confession. Though character witnesses speak for her, she is condemned on the ballots, and her confessor — threatening "excommunication and hell fire in my last moments" — pressures her into signing a confession, which she later retracts to Elizabeth: "I did confess; but I confessed a lie. I confessed, that I might obtain absolution" I did confess; but I confessed a lie. I confessed, that I might obtain absolution.

In fact the murderer is the creature, who killed William and planted the portrait on Justine "in his hellish sport" — Victor knows this throughout the trial.

Why Victor stays silent

His silence is deliberate, and he gives two overlapping reasons:

  • No one would believe the story. After spotting the creature near Geneva, he reflects that he must tell what he knows, "But I paused when I reflected on the story that I had to tell": a being he himself made, met at midnight among mountain precipices — and his recent nervous fever "would give an air of delirium to a tale otherwise so utterly improbable." He notes that he himself "should have looked upon it as the ravings of insanity" I well knew that if any other had communicated such a relation to me, I should have looked upon it as the ravings of insanity.
  • A confession would be useless anyway. Even if credited, nothing practical follows: the creature could scale Mont Salêve and elude any pursuit — "Who could arrest a creature capable of scaling the overhanging sides of Mont Salêve?" — so "These reflections determined me, and I resolved to remain silent" These reflections determined me, and I resolved to remain silent. At the trial he adds that since he was absent when the murder occurred, claiming guilt himself "would have been considered as the ravings of a madman, and would not have exculpated her who suffered through me" such a declaration would have been considered as the ravings of a madman, and would not have exculpated her who suffered through me.

So his refusal is partly cowardice and self-protection dressed as realism: he judges the truth incredible and impractical, and lets an innocent person hang rather than face being thought mad — a decision the novel frames as his second crime, worse than the creation itself.

How did the Creature first learn to make and keep fire

The short answer is that he didn't learn to *make* fire at all — he learned to keep, feed and revive one he found by accident. The whole episode comes from the Creature's own narration early in his story:

Finding it. While wandering near Ingolstadt, tormented by cold, he stumbles onto an abandoned fire: "I found a fire which had been left by some wandering beggars, and was overcome with delight at the warmth I experienced from it" — and his first experiment ends with a burn, prompting his reflection "How strange, I thought, that the same cause should produce such opposite effects!"One day, when I was oppressed by cold, I found a fire which had been left by some wandering beggars, and was overcome with delight at the warmth I experienced from it

Learning to feed it. He investigates what it is made of and works out fuel by trial: he gathers branches, but "they were wet, and would not burn"; watching, he notices that "the wet wood which I had placed near the heat dried, and itself became inflamed," deduces the cause by touch, and stocks up a great quantity of wood to dry beforehandThe wet wood which I had placed near the heat dried, and itself became inflamed. I reflected on this; and, by touching the various branches, I discovered the cause.

Learning to keep it overnight. Afraid it will die while he sleeps, he invents a covering technique — "I covered it carefully with dry wood and leaves, and placed wet branches upon it" — and in the morning finds that uncovering it lets a breeze fan it back into flame, which teaches him to contrive "a fan of branches, which roused the embers when they were nearly extinguished"I uncovered it, and a gentle breeze quickly fanned it into a flame. I observed this also, and contrived a fan of branches. He also notices fire gives light as well as heat, and uses the live embers to roast food (berries are spoiled by it, "the nuts and roots much improved").

The catch. When hunger drives him to leave that spot, he realizes he has only ever *preserved* fire, never created it: "I exceedingly lamented the loss of the fire which I had obtained through accident, and knew not how to re-produce it"I exceedingly lamented the loss of the fire which I had obtained through accident, and knew not how to re-produce it. So his fire-making knowledge is essentially empirical husbandry of an ember — drying fuel, insulating the heap, fanning it — rather than the art of striking a spark.

Why does the creature identify with Satan rather than Adam in Paradise Lost?

The creature reads *Paradise Lost* "as a true history" and uses it as his only vocabulary for understanding himself — so the choice between Adam and Satan is really a diagnosis of how he has been treated.

The Adam claim is the one he starts with. Structurally he *is* Adam: "Like Adam, I was created apparently united by no link to any other being in existence" — a unique creation, with no mother, no species, no kin. He later presses exactly this on Victor: "I ought to be thy Adam; but I am rather the fallen angel, whom thou drivest from joy for no misdeed" but I am rather the fallen angel, whom thou drivest from joy for no misdeed. Every where I see bliss, from which I alone am irrevocably excluded. I was benevolent and good;. So he doesn't reject the Adam parallel outright; he claims it as his due and then reports that it failed.

Why it fails — three asymmetries he measures himself against:

  1. The manner of his making. Adam "had come forth from the hands of God a perfect creature, happy and prosperous, guarded by the especial care of his Creator," permitted to learn from "beings of a superior nature" — whereas the creature's creator fled him in disgust and left him to raise himself in a hovel. Adam's creator answered his supplication; his did not: "I remembered Adam's supplication to his Creator; but where was mine? he had abandoned me, and, in the bitterness of my heart, I cursed him."
  1. Companionship. Adam was given Eve. The creature dreams of "amiable and lovely creatures sympathizing with my feelings," then records the waking verdict: "no Eve soothed my sorrows, or shared my thoughts; I was alone." Denied a mate, he later demands one — and destroys the half-made female, sealing the very solitude that drove the comparison.
  1. Beauty and status before the world. Adam was made "beautiful and alluring"; the creature is a "filthy type" of his maker, "hideous," "gigantic," "solitary and detested" — so that even the cottagers' virtues only sharpen his exclusion.

And the identification with Satan is specifically an identification of *emotion*, not of crime. The line that names Satan as "the fitter emblem of my condition" gives its reason at once: "for often, like him, when I viewed the bliss of my protectors, the bitter gall of envy rose within me." He sees the De Laceys' happiness as Satan saw Paradise — bliss from which one is irrevocably excluded while others bask in it. Crucially, he insists the exclusion came first: "I was benevolent and good; misery made me a fiend." In his reading of Milton, Satan is the being cast out of joy *before* he deserved it — which is precisely how he experiences Victor's abandonment (driven "from joy for no misdeed").

There is a bitter twist in the comparison: he actually judges himself *worse off* than Satan. "Satan had his companions, fellow-devils, to admire and encourage him; but I am solitary and detested." So the Satan identification is not self-aggrandizement but the closest available emblem of damnation-without-fellowship — and even it understates his condition.

In short: Adam is what he was owed by the logic of creation; Satan is what he actually received. The gap between the two is the novel's indictment of Victor — the creature becomes the fallen angel not by nature or by sin, but by abandonment and by the envy that isolation bred in him.

Why does Victor insist on finishing his work alone in the Orkneys rather than staying with Clerval in Perth

Victor's insistence on solitude is less a preference than a necessity driven by the secret work he is carrying north with him. Several motives stack up in that chapter:

1. The work itself cannot be done in company. Before leaving London he already knows where this is heading: "I packed my chemical instruments, and the materials I had collected, resolving to finish my labours in some obscure nook in the northern highlands of Scotland." I packed my chemical instruments, and the materials I had collected, resolving to finish my labours in some obscure nook Perth means staying as a guest of a Scottish acquaintance, making polite conversation — impossible while secretly assembling a second creature. The Orkney island he finally chooses is "a place fitted for such a work, being hardly more than a rock, whose high sides were continually beaten upon by the waves," so sparsely populated that after hiring a hut he "lived ungazed at and unmolested." On the whole island there were but three miserable huts, and one of these was vacant when I arrived. This I hired.

2. He can no longer perform normalcy around strangers. At Perth he tells Clerval plainly: "I was in no mood to laugh and talk with strangers, or enter into their feelings or plans with the good humour expected from a guest." But I was in no mood to laugh and talk with strangers, or enter into their feelings or plans with the good humour expected from a guest Throughout the journey company has been agony — "this barrier was sealed with the blood of William and Justine" — and he has repeatedly begged off Clerval's social engagements to stay alone. A house full of cheerful hosts is exactly the setting he cannot endure.

3. He wants to shield Clerval from the creature — and from the truth. He is convinced the fiend is tracking him: "I did not doubt but that the monster followed me, and would discover himself to me when I should have finished, that he might receive his companion." Having parted from my friend, I determined to visit some remote spot of Scotland, and finish my work in solitude He has already feared "the fiend followed me, and might expedite my remissness by murdering my companion," hovering over Henry "as his shadow, to protect him." Removing himself removes Henry from the moment of the creature's expected appearance — and keeps Henry from ever learning what the "labour" is.

4. Time pressure. He has "neglected my promise for some time" and dreads "the dæmon's disappointment," fearing vengeance on his family in Geneva if he delays. Solitude lets him work without interruption — though even then the labour drags, done "in cold blood," his heart sickening at the work of his hands.

So the split at Perth is the practical solution to an impossible bind: he must finish the female creature quickly, secretly, and somewhere the monster can find him but no one else can watch — while Clerval, the one person whose company still soothes him, is precisely the person who must be kept away.

Chapter by chapter

  1. 开头部分 … LETTER I.

    This opening section frames the novel's premise and launches Robert Walton's Arctic expedition narrative. The Preface defends the tale as founded on an event "supposed, by Dr. Darwin, and some of the physiological writers of Germany, as not of impossible occurrence," preserving "the truth of the elementary principles of human nature" while innovating on combinations, and recounts its origin in the "summer of 1816 in the environs of Geneva" among ghost stories. Letter I, addressed to Mrs. Saville from St. Petersburgh, Dec. 11th, 17—, details Walton's resolve to reach the pole, his whaling apprenticeship, and plans to hire a ship at Archangel, sailing in June. It carries through to his departure preparations; the voyage itself and Victor Frankenstein's story belong to later letters and volumes. Why does Walton imagine the pole as a region of beauty rather than frost? Where and when did the author say the story was begun?

  2. LETTER II. … LETTER III.

    Walton's letters from Archangel and the high latitude record his preparations and early progress toward "unexplored regions," answering whether he wavers in his resolutions and what sustains him. He laments having "no friend" to "sympathize with me," describes his lieutenant's "wonderful courage" and the master's "heroically generous" renunciation of his Russian mistress, and admits being "self-educated" and "more illiterate than many school-boys of fifteen." He concludes his resolutions are "as fixed as fate," sailing once weather permits, and reports in Letter III that he is "safe, and well advanced," his men undismayed by "floating sheets of ice." The section carries through to embarkation and early voyage; the creature's narrative, Victor Frankenstein's account, and the consequences of the enterprise belong to later parts.

  3. LETTER IV.

    Walton's journal of August 5th–19th records the ship's entrapment in ice, the sighting of a "being which had the shape of a man, but apparently of gigantic stature" on a sledge, and the rescue of a second traveller — an European, "dreadfully emaciated by fatigue and suffering," who "capitulated for his safety" before coming aboard. The narrative moves from wonder at the "apparition" to Walton's growing love for the stranger, "so gentle, yet so wise," who seeks "one who fled from me" and calls him "the dæmon." It concludes with the stranger's offer to relate his misfortunes, which Walton resolves to record "as nearly as possible in his own words." The letter carries through to the promise of that narrative; the tale itself, and the "powers and occurrences" it contains, are left to the stranger's own account. Key terms: the northern pole, the ground sea, the sledge, friendship, "internal evidence of the truth."

  4. FRANKENSTEIN; OR, THE MODERN PROMETHEUS. … CHAPTER I.

    Victor Frankenstein narrates his Genevese origins, his father's marriage to Caroline Beaufort, the adoption of Elizabeth Lavenza, and friendship with Henry Clerval, then traces "the birth of that passion" for natural philosophy — Cornelius Agrippa, Paracelsus, Albertus Magnus, the thunder-storm near Belrive — arguing that his father's cursory dismissal, rather than explanation, left him to "wild fancies." The chapter closes on the harmonious domestic circle before "misfortune had tainted my mind," leaving the creation itself, Ingolstadt, and the "tale of misery" to later chapters. Key terms: natural philosophy, philosopher's stone, elixir of life, electricity.

  5. CHAPTER II.

    This chapter traces Victor Frankenstein's transition from Geneva to the university of Ingolstadt at seventeen, framed by "the first misfortune of my life"—his mother's death from scarlet fever after attending Elizabeth. It develops through his melancholy departure, his repugnance to strangers, and his encounters with two professors: M. Krempe, who dismisses his reading of Albertus Magnus and Paracelsus as "nonsense," and M. Waldman, whose panegyric upon modern chemistry converts him. It concludes that this day "decided my future destiny," directing him to apply to every branch of natural philosophy. It stops at his enrollment and laboratory instruction, leaving the actual experiments and creation to later chapters.

  6. CHAPTER III.

    This chapter traces Victor Frankenstein's turn to chemistry at Ingolstadt under M. Waldman and M. Krempe, his two years of rapid improvement and chemical instrument discoveries, and his shift to physiology, where he asks "whence did the principle of life proceed?" and, after studying anatomy and "the natural decay and corruption of the human body," discovers "the cause of generation and life" and becomes "capable of bestowing animation upon lifeless matter." It covers his decision to create a being "of a gigantic stature," about eight feet high, and his secret toil in a solitary workshop, ending as the work nears completion and his health fails. The actual secret of animation is withheld; the creation's completion and consequences belong to Chapter IV.

  7. CHAPTER IV.

    This chapter narrates the "accomplishment of my toils": on a "dreary night of November" Victor Frankenstein infuses "a spark of being into the lifeless thing," then recoils in "breathless horror and disgust" at the creature's "dull yellow eye," "yellow skin," and "straight black lips." It traces his night of "wildest dreams" (Elizabeth, the "corpse of my dead mother"), his flight through Ingolstadt past the "church of Ingolstadt," and the arrival of the "Swiss diligence" bringing "Henry Clerval." Victor's "nervous fever" confines him "several months," nursed solely by Clerval, until "a divine spring" restores him; the chapter closes with Clerval producing "a letter... from your cousin." It leaves the creature's fate and the letter's contents to later chapters. How did Henry Clerval come to be in Ingolstadt and nurse Victor through his illness? What did Victor dream about the night after the creature's animation?

  8. CHAPTER V.

    This chapter opens with Elizabeth Lavenza's letter from Geneva, March 18th, 17—, reporting family health, Ernest's proposed profession, Justine Moritz's history, and gossip, then follows Victor's convalescence at Ingolstadt: his antipathy to natural philosophy, visits to professors M. Waldman and M. Krempe, joint study of Persian, Arabic, and Hebrew with Clerval, and a pedestrian tour ending in "unbridled joy and hilarity." It carries through to the Sunday return to college and stops before Chapter VI. Key terms: Ingolstadt, Geneva, Clerval, Justine Moritz, Cornelius Agrippa. The creation's aftermath and Justine's later fate are left to other parts.

  9. CHAPTER VI.

    This chapter opens with Alphonse Frankenstein's letter announcing that "William is dead!—that sweet child... he is murdered!" and traces Victor's journey home, where he glimpses "the wretch, the filthy dæmon to whom I had given life" scaling Mont Salêve and resolves to "remain silent" about the true murderer. It carries through to the accusation of "Justine Moritz," whose trial is set for that day, with the miniature of Caroline Beaufort found in her pocket as the damning evidence. Victor insists "Justine is innocent," and the chapter closes with Elizabeth's plea to "justify my poor guiltless Justine," leaving the trial's outcome and verdict to Chapter VII.

  10. CHAPTER VII.

    This chapter covers the trial, condemnation, and prison visit of Justine, accused of murdering the child William. It opens with the family attending court and moves through the circumstantial evidence against her — her night out, the market-woman's testimony, the picture found in her pocket — then her defence, Elizabeth's address to the court, and the black ballots condemning her. It carries through to Justine's confession that she "confessed a lie" to obtain absolution from her confessor, and closes with Victor's private anguish as "the true murderer." Key figures: Justine, Elizabeth, Victor, William, the confessor, the judges. It leaves the dæmon's own account and Victor's later confrontations to other chapters.

  11. FRANKENSTEIN; OR, THE MODERN PROMETHEUS. … CHAPTER I.

    Opening Volume II, this chapter traces Victor's "remorse and the sense of guilt" after "Justine died," showing how "the dead calmness of inaction and certainty" replaces hope and fear, and how his "abhorrence of this fiend" mixes with thoughts of suicide restrained by love of "the heroic and suffering Elizabeth." It carries the family from Geneva to Belrive and on the excursion to "the valley of Chamounix," ending with Victor at his window watching "the pallid lightning that played over Mont Blânc." The monster's own account, and any confrontation with him, are left to later chapters. Key terms: remorse, solitude, the fiend, William and Justine, Elizabeth, Ernest, the Arve.

  12. CHAPTER II.

    This chapter covers Victor Frankenstein's excursion to Montanvert and his confrontation with the "wretch whom I had created." It begins with a fine day at the source of the Arveiron, turns to a rain-depressed morning driving Victor alone up the "sea of ice," and reaches its climax when the "figure of a man" appears "with superhuman speed." The dæmon argues he "was benevolent and good; misery made me a fiend," demanding a hearing before Victor destroys "the work of your hands." Victor, moved by "curiosity, and compassion," consents to listen. The chapter ends at the "hut upon the mountain," where the creature "began his tale" — the story itself is left to Chapter III. Key terms: Montanvert, Mont Blânc, the glacier, the "fallen angel," the "duties of a creator towards his creature."

  13. CHAPTER III.

    The Creature narrates "the original æra of my being," tracing how "a strange multiplicity of sensations" gradually resolved into distinct perception: light, hunger, cold, the discovery of fire, and the "pleasant songs of the birds." The narrative moves from the forest near Ingolstadt to a shepherd's hut, a village where he is attacked, and finally a hovel adjoining a cottage, where he observes the De Lacey family — an old man, a young girl, and a youth — through a chink, feeling "a mixture of pain and pleasure" at their kindness. It closes as the family "extinguished their lights, and retired." The chapter covers only his earliest sensory education and first human contact; his acquisition of language, the family's history, and his creator's fate belong to later chapters.

  14. CHAPTER IV.

    This chapter narrates the creature's winter and spring among the cottagers — the blind father, Agatha, and Felix — as he secretly assists their labours, steals no longer once he sees their poverty, and begins to learn their language, acquiring the words fire, milk, bread, wood, and the names of the cottagers themselves. It develops his growing love for these "superior beings" and his plan to win their favour despite his deformity, discovered when he views himself in a transparent pool. It concludes with spring's arrival and his hope gilded by "bright rays of hope." The chapter carries through to the end of spring; his actual presentation to the family and their reception of him are left to later chapters.

  15. CHAPTER V.

    The creature narrates how Safie's arrival at the cottage lets him and the "Arabian" learn language together, using Volney's Ruins of Empires as the textbook; through Felix's instruction he gains "a cursory knowledge of history," the "division of property," and "rank, descent, and noble blood," then turns these lessons on himself to ask "What was I?" — concluding he is "a monster, a blot upon the earth," with "no money, no friends, no kind of property," and that "sorrow only increased with knowledge." The chapter runs from spring's arrival through two months of study, ending as he prepares to explain "to what these feelings tended"; the cottagers' own story and his subsequent actions are left to later chapters.

  16. CHAPTER VI.

    The Creature recounts "the history of my friends," the De Lacey family, from their affluence in Paris to their exile in a German cottage. The narrative traces how the "Turkish merchant," father of Safie, was condemned to death unjustly; how Felix vowed to deliver him, won Safie's love, and engineered the escape across Mont Cenis to Leghorn; and how the Turk's ingratitude, the family's imprisonment and loss of fortune, and Safie's own flight from a harem prospect brought them to poverty. It closes with Safie's arrival at her lover's cottage. Key figures: De Lacey, Felix, Agatha, Safie, the Turk; institutions: the French government, a convent at Leghorn. The Creature's own acquisition of language and his later appeal to the family are left to other chapters.

  17. CHAPTER VII.

    The creature recounts how his "intellect" developed after finding a leathern portmanteau containing Paradise Lost, Plutarch's Lives, and the Sorrows of Werter, which produced "an infinity of new images and feelings" and prompted his questions "Who was I? What was I?" He reads your journal of the four months preceding "my creation," cursing his "accursed origin," then resolves to introduce himself to the blind old man De Lacy. The trial fails: Felix, Safie, and Agatha return, Agatha faints, and he escapes to his hovel. The chapter carries through to this failed interview; his subsequent demands on Frankenstein belong to later chapters.

  18. CHAPTER VIII.

    The Creature narrates his abandonment after the De Lacy family flees the cottage, his burning of it, his journey to Geneva, and his escalating "everlasting war against the species." He recounts saving a girl from a river only to be shot, strangling William Frankenstein ("my first victim"), and planting the portrait on Justine — events whose trials fall elsewhere. The chapter closes with his demand that Victor create "a companion... of the same species, and have the same defects," leaving Victor's response to later chapters. Key terms: "rage and revenge," "hell within me," De Lacy, Felix, Safie, Agatha, the Arabian, M. Frankenstein, Geneva, the portrait.

  19. CHAPTER IX.

    This chapter opens with the being's demand that Victor "create a female for me," and traces Victor's refusal, the fiend's counter-argument that he is "malicious because I am miserable," and Victor's eventual consent "on your solemn oath to quit Europe for ever." It closes with Victor's descent to Chamounix and return to Geneva, where "the promise I had made to the dæmon weighed upon my mind." Key terms include the "interchange of sympathies," the proposed exile to "the vast wilds of South America," and the "ice caves of the glaciers." The chapter carries through to Victor's passive acquiescence in family arrangements; the actual creation of the female, and the consequences of that labour, are left to later chapters.

  20. FRANKENSTEIN; OR, THE MODERN PROMETHEUS. … CHAPTER I.

    Victor, returned to Geneva, cannot "collect the courage to recommence my work" on a female creature, yet fears "the vengeance of the disappointed fiend." His father, conjecturing the cause of his gloom, urges an immediate marriage to Elizabeth; Victor, bound by his "unhappy promise," instead proposes a two-year tour to England to consult "an English philosopher," concealing his true motive. Departing in August with Clerval, he descends the Rhine to Rotterdam and reaches London by December, resolving to "fulfil my promise while abroad." The chapter carries through to his arrival at the Thames; the actual creation of the female, and the monster's fate, are left to later chapters.

  21. CHAPTER II.

    This chapter traces Victor Frankenstein's travels through London, Windsor, Oxford, Matlock, Cumberland, Edinburgh, and finally a remote Orkney island, where he devotes himself to "collect the materials necessary for my new creation." The narrative develops through his anguished company with Henry Clerval, his dread of the "dæmon's disappointment," and his revulsion at the "filthy process" of his second experiment, concluding with his labour "considerably advanced" but haunted by "obscure forebodings of evil." Key figures include Clerval, Elizabeth, William, Justine, and Hampden; institutions include Oxford's colleges and Edinburgh's new town. The chapter begins with their arrival in London and ends at the Orkney hut; the actual completion of the work and the creature's appearance are left to later chapters.

  22. CHAPTER III.

    This chapter covers Victor's refusal to create a female companion and the monster's vow of revenge. It begins in the laboratory where Victor, reflecting on the "race of devils" that might propagate, tears the half-finished creature to pieces; the monster then appears at the casement and, after a confrontation, declares "I shall be with you on your wedding-night." Victor packs his chemical instruments, casts the relics into the sea, and is driven by a north-east wind to Ireland, where he is arrested on suspicion of murder and taken to Mr. Kirwin. The chapter carries through to Victor's arrival before the magistrate; the trial and its outcome are left to Chapter IV.

  23. CHAPTER IV.

    This chapter narrates Victor Frankenstein's arrest, imprisonment, and acquittal for the murder of Henry Clerval. It opens with his introduction to the magistrate, Mr. Kirwin, and the depositions of fishermen and witnesses who found the strangled body, then turns on Victor's recognition of Clerval and his ensuing two-month fever, during which he raves of murdering William, Justine, and Clerval. Mr. Kirwin's kindness, the arrival of Victor's father, and the grand jury's rejection of the bill — proved by his presence on the Orkney Islands — lead to liberation. It closes with the voyage from Ireland to Holyhead; the creature's pursuit and Geneva's resolution belong to later chapters.

  24. CHAPTER V.

    This chapter traces Victor's return from Ireland to Geneva and his fatal decision to proceed with his marriage to Elizabeth Lavenza. It opens with the journey to Havre and Paris, where Elizabeth's letter revives the fiend's threat—"I will be with you on your wedding-night!"—which Victor resolves to face rather than postpone. He marries Elizabeth, and the chapter closes as they land at Evian, his "cares and fears" reviving. Key figures include Victor's father, Clerval, Justine, and the monster; the charge of murder and the secret of the wretch he created remain unconfessed. The wedding-night catastrophe itself is left to Chapter VI.

  25. CHAPTER VI.

    This chapter narrates the destruction of Elizabeth on her bridal bier and the deaths of William, Justine, Clerval, and Victor's father, tracing Victor's descent into a dungeon, his release, and his awakening to revenge. It develops from the storm-lit vigil at the inn through the monster's jeer at the open window, the hopeless pursuit by boats and nets, and Victor's return to Geneva, where his father sinks under the tidings and dies in his arms. It concludes with Victor's deposition before a criminal judge in the town, who listens with attention and kindness but reverts to incredulity, leaving Victor to devote himself to the monster's destruction. Key terms: the fiend, the monster, the lake, the Alps, the magistrate, revenge.

  26. CHAPTER VII.

    This chapter carries Victor Frankenstein's narration from his vow of vengeance at the Geneva cemetery through his pursuit of the "fiend" across Tartary, Russia, and the frozen northern ocean, ending with his death aboard Walton's ship and the creature's final self-condemnation beside the corpse. It answers how the pursuit unfolded — the inscriptions left on trees and stone, the sledge journey, the ice breaking between them — and concludes with Victor's dying charge that Walton destroy the monster, and the creature's vow to "consume to ashes this miserable frame." Key figures are Victor, Walton, Margaret, Elizabeth, Clerval, William, Justine, and the dæmon. The creature's own formation and earlier history are left to other parts of the book.

Open the book

Read your own books this way

Upload a paper, a long report or an ebook to MindMax Read and ask it the same way — free, in your browser. MindMax for desktop does it across a whole folder, and keeps your notes as files.

Already have MindMax? Open this book in it →